nomoneystillproblems: (sure i'll take you for a swing on my web)
Peter "Bra Snatcher" Parker ([personal profile] nomoneystillproblems) wrote2014-12-03 09:15 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry
Entry tags:

call me maybe


parker.peter@cdc.org
(0) UNREAD MESSAGES
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only
rippedoff: (the shadows make it DRAMATIC)

Day 71, as I dominate your inbox

[personal profile] rippedoff 2014-12-11 06:48 am (UTC)(link)
FROM: jacobs.shinobu@cdc.org

All right, Thing 1, time to prove yourself. I'm giving you this list of people to stalk and write reports on.

FROM: jacobs.shinobu@cdc.org

GILBERT, ELENA (NHD-C12-GLT-831)
FAIR, ZACK (NHD-C12-ZFR-779)
FORBES, CAROLINE (M02-B25-210)
OAK, GREEN (M02-B25-133)

Extra credit for anything you can find on SHEPARD, LYDIA (NHD-C12-SHD-011).

FROM: jacobs.shinobu@cdc.org

Don't disappoint me. Contact me immediately if you run into any problems.
nomoneystillproblems: (are you hitting on me)

Let's just rename it A Quiet Evening by the Fire with Peter Parker and Shinobu Jacobs

[personal profile] nomoneystillproblems 2014-12-12 05:29 pm (UTC)(link)
[Why...is he being asked to spy on a woman in containment that's a little weird, but at least that's the extra credit part. Still, though, even with the rest (two of which he's found out he's effing roomming with) it doesn't sit easy with him. Not one bit.]

FROM: parker.peter@cdc.org

May I ask a question about the assignment?
rippedoff: (BITCHFACE 4)

LMAO YEAH I'm sorry, I didn't think it would come to this many threads...

[personal profile] rippedoff 2014-12-12 08:55 pm (UTC)(link)
FROM: jacobs.shinobu@cdc.org

If you've got questions, you might as well ask them now.
nomoneystillproblems: (in fact she's a future supermodel)

whatever they just have a really kawaii tsun relationship now

[personal profile] nomoneystillproblems 2014-12-13 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)
FROM: parker.peter@cdc.org

Is this just a test or is it something we're going to be using down the line? I know there's contention between the teams, and everyone here hates Green. But this seems kind of like a preemptive strike.

FROM: parker.peter@cdc.org

I was under the impression that our covert ops was going to be against whatever's living on the planets we're destroying, not CDC hires.
rippedoff: (the shadows make it DRAMATIC)

[personal profile] rippedoff 2014-12-13 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)
FROM: jacobs.shinobu@cdc.org

Probably more of a test. But with Dagger, you never really know.

As long as you follow the mission parameters of not being caught snooping around, though, you should be fine, right?

FROM: jacobs.shinobu@cdc.org

Covert ops also means that we're the guys who would potentially take out those that might endanger ourselves, within the team.
nomoneystillproblems: (are you hitting on me)

[personal profile] nomoneystillproblems 2014-12-16 12:19 am (UTC)(link)
FROM: parker.peter@cdc.org

And how often does it happen that someone gets classified as a 'threat'? Do we get reasons why or just orders?
rippedoff: (wind machines are everywhere)

[personal profile] rippedoff 2014-12-16 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
FROM: jacobs.shinobu@cdc.org

Not often. I think it kinda depends on if we get reasons or not. It's not our job to question them, though, if it's coming from our commanding officer.
nomoneystillproblems: (put a damn shirt on)

[personal profile] nomoneystillproblems 2014-12-16 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
FROM: parker.peter@cdc.org

That's super swell. And pretty much what I expected.

FROM: parker.peter@cdc.org

Thanks for clarifying.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only